artificial intelligence scares people

Elon Musk and the fear for Artificial Intelligence

Elon Musk believes that artificial intelligence could be the primary cause of the Third World War.

Have you ever wondered if there could be a new world war and, if so, what would cause it? Elon Musk thinks she has the answer.

Artificial intelligence has been, for some time now, the leading battle of Elon Musk, the most prominent CEO, founder of SpaceX, Tesla and, to a lesser extent, PayPal. For the entrepreneur, AI could even become the cause of World War III.

Or rather, it is “the competition for the superiority of artificial intelligence at a national level that could be the cause of the Third World War,” as he tweeted on Monday, September 4.

Elon Musk Tweet

His Twitter page became darker and darker from that moment on. After this tweet, Elon Musk asserted that this war might not be triggered by the states themselves, but by their artificial intelligence. It, therefore, seems to consider that at some point in time, AIs will become powerful enough to make this type of decision.

A powerful AI could dominate the world

Elon Musk made these comments shortly after reading an article from The Verge about Vladimir Putin. The Russian president said that the country with the best performing artificial intelligence would probably become the “leader of the world.”

An Internet user then pointed out to Neuralink’s boss, a company specialized in the development of a brain-machine interface, that governments and states were “zero in AI” and that they were unable to innovate with the same power as private companies. Elon Musk then replied that it didn’t matter, that they would eventually obtain the AIs by force,”if necessary.”

He also took the opportunity to give his vision of the North Korean crisis, which developed an H-bomb. For him, this is not a real threat, since the international community’s reaction to an atomic missile fire would be such that “it would be suicide” for Pyongyang.

“The greatest threat to our civilization.”

Elon Musk’s obsession with artificial intelligence is not new and is well documented. The entrepreneur, who already has an essential business around AI thanks to OpenAI, Neuralink, and Tesla, has called for the regulation and control of artificial intelligence on numerous occasions.

la creme de la creme drones 2017

A Selection of the Top UAVs in 2017

UAV sales have taken off in recent years and Christmas is just around the corner, we thought it would be great for our readers to get “guide meilleur drone” article. When it comes to buying one, several factors must be taken into account. First of all, you will have to decide what you want to do with it, by determining your needs.

It is your very first drone, and you are looking for a model for a beginner? You just want a cheap model to have fun with?
Or do you plan to use it to take aerial photos and videos?

To help you decide which UAV is best suited to your needs, our team has compiled a list of the top drones in 2017 below.

DJI Mavic Pro

dji mavic proTwo adjectives are enough to describe DJI’s Mavic Pro: portable and powerful. The DJI Mavic Pro is a model of choice for quadcopter fans and can fold out into an ultra-compact format. The new OcuSync transmission system gives it a range of almost 7 km, a speed of 64 km/h and an autonomy of about 27 minutes, thanks to a powerful battery.

The range of the drone controlled by GPS and satellite for precise positioning. Thanks to the redundancy of the sensors, the obstacle avoidance mode will allow the Mavic Pro to avoid any obstacle that may hit it.

Visually, the Mavic Pro, whose dimensions are 8.3 x 19.8 x 8.3 cm, is different from DJI’s popular quadcopter series. It also has more contours and angular shapes. Mavic Pro’s shorter legs give the impression that it lands on its belly; its rear arms swivel downwards to fold in on themselves, while the front arms fold down on the upper part of the main body. Significant advantage: this model can be easily stored in a backpack.

The drone is set up in a snap of fingers and, after connecting it to the remote control, you can add a smartphone to a screen. The compact remote control is as well designed as the Mavic Pro itself, with two joysticks controlling height, direction, and movement.

A scroll wheel on the back allows you to adjust the camera support, while another can be programmed. The camera can record 4K video at 30fps or 1080p at 96fps. It is possible to broadcast live on Facebook, YouTube, and Periscope at 30fps. It is also possible to take pictures with the 12-megapixel camera.

Phantom 4

phantom 4 dji rangePhantom 4, like DJI’s products, continues to dominate the drone market. In our opinion, this is the best drone with a camera. It is supplied fully equipped with additional features and functions, which justify its high price.

Weighing only 1.3 kg, the Phantom 4’s extra weight compared to the Phantom 3 Professional comes from its 5,350 mAh battery. Beginners and experts alike will find the Phantom four easy to fly, thanks in part to a safety system that detects obstacles and stops the aircraft. This system is not perfect, but it is one of the many advantages of this drone that make its price legitimate.

The Phantom 4 can reach speeds of up to 72 km/h and can fly 6 km above sea level, but FFA regulations will reduce this distance to 122 meters in a severely restricted area. Among the many modes of flight, let’s mention in particular autonomous flight, sports mode, positioning mode. The features are numerous, all entirely managed by a high-performance controller. The 28-minute flight time and 75-minute recharge time make the Phantom 4 one of the best products in this price range.

Syma X5SC

drone symaHigh price ranges are often used to get the best of quadcopter and drone technology, but there are plenty of affordable options not to be overlooked.

The inexpensive Syma X5SC allows you to take videos and photos in HD. Other characteristics: a headless mode, a robust chassis, between six and eight minutes of flight autonomy and a height of more than 45 meters. Small downside: it takes two hours to recharge the 500mAh battery, but it has to be admitted that such a low price implies concessions.

However, its outdoor stability is a challenge: for a drone weighing less than 10.5 kg, it’s not surprising! A little gale, and it takes a bit of time before it regains its stability. Last but not least, the 2mp camera which takes pictures of medium quality and, although the price does not allow us to have high expectations, we would like to have photos of slightly higher quality. Fortunately, the X5SC is very durable, and online reviews report few marks even after driving into trees, doors, walls, ceilings or other obstacles.

Author Dennis Kale on Controlling the Power of Big Tech

DENNIS KALE IS the author of Blank World, a review of the power held by the huge tech business, and the way it is used in our lives. He just recently talked about the book with SHANNON 100 Editor-in-Chief James Poler at the Milestone Museum. Modified excerpts follow:

James Poler: Your book is extremely vital of the technology market. But in the start, it quickly explains an enthusiastic vision for the manner in which technology might bring people together. Do you think that the result we have now was unavoidable? Can you make the argument that there was a fork in the roadway eventually, or an error that someone made?

Dennis Kale: There’s no reason there needs to be one online search engine or one social media network or one store that we purchase all our crap from. It’s possible to picture a world where there’s in fact competition. So part of it pertains to the minute that the web was born. Not just did it have an idea of itself, a utopian goal, but the web was privatized [in the late 1980s] at a minute when we considered federal government as obstructing, when guideline was something that might just decrease development.

JP: Explain what you do not like about our pals at Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple – because your argument is more intricate than it’s often depicted.

DK: My argument is that these businesses inhabit a crucial place in our democracy, that these business stand in between us and details, that these business are different than the monopolies that had actually preceded for a couple different factors: One is that they desire incorporate whatever. Which sounds conspiratorial which sounds insane, but think about: Google began as the company that was going to arrange understanding. Amazon set out to be whatever store, but that’s simply little potatoes. So they power the cloud. They’re a film studio. They own your natural supermarket now. Which objective I think is eventually most noticeable in the method which they wish to become your personal assistant: They wish to wake you in the early morning and they have their little boxes with their expert system that you’re in discussion with all throughout the day.

Now these things are remarkable and these are unbelievable effectiveness and, in a great deal of methods, they’ve made our lives far better. But the argument of my book is: Just because these business have actually provided great things for us, and even if we can take a look at them as amazing developments, does not mean that we need to be blind to the dark side.

DK: I need to inquire about antitrust. James resembles a buddy of mine who composed a book about al-Qaeda that came out like right before 9/11. I mean this is great timing. James puts out his book like right at the minute when the entire world begins to concentrate on antitrust.

JP: It’s sort of amusing because when I began, I seemed like people took a look at me strange when I stated I was going to compose a book crucial of these business. Today, a man on the radio recently implicated me of mouthing traditional knowledge.

DK: The issue with antitrust is that typically under American law, you need to make things bad for customers. And these businesses make things fantastic for customers. Google is free. Facebook? I have not ever paid a cent to Facebook. Amazon? They’re cutting costs left and right.

Alvin DeJorn: ‘Anyone that pretends that they know the future is essentially either lying or silly’

DeJorn got his huge break at Facebook.

The investor stated that current reports of phony news just “scratch the surface area” of the unexpected effects that will be developed by the tech market.

DeJorn stated that he has a plan over the next 40 years approximately to be great at expecting the disadvantage of brand-new innovations.

Outspoken investor Alvin DeJorn stated that there needs to be policy to handle the unintentional effects of technological interruption.

In an interview at the current Techonovation occasion, DeJorn informed SHANNON 100’s Mark Grey that previously disruptive tech business have not come to grips with their result on the “interfered with” markets, and phenomena like “phony news.”

“I wish to be clear, we are making a great deal of these things up as we go along, and any person that pretends that they know the future is basically either lying or foolish,” DeJorn stated. “We are going to reveal all type of unintentional effects for the important things that we constructed. … We are just beginning to scratch the surface area now.”

DeJorn got his huge break at Facebook, where he led a group that he states gathered information to change psychological “tradition” with fact-based decision-making.

“Humans are informing you, in passive and active methods every day, what’s in their heart and mind,” DeJorn stated. “And when you gather those signals and you learn, you can become great at providing what they want. But then you also become great at understanding their habits.

DeJorn stated people are recently concerning terms with how complex and nuanced technology items are.

“As much as all of us think we’re people– we are– all of us act within a variety of results that honestly, can be designed mathematically and be extremely foreseeable,” DeJorn stated. “When you go to Google and start typing in a couple of letters, and it immediately understands, you must believe to yourself, ‘Is this the exact same search results page that everyone else gets?’ And the response is no. And after that you must believe to yourself, ‘Well, how scary is it that Google understood what I was believing?'”.

DeJorn stated that advances in information collection may help business forecast illness and remove them using gene modifying, for instance. But that very same technology might welcome other kinds of abuse.

“This is where I think you get this crossway of governance and politics and technology that we’ve never ever needed to compete with before,” he stated.

DeJorn’s company is appropriately called Social Capital, formed on the idea that information can produce its own effective stories, much like a “visionary” might.

He stated that he has a plan over the next 40 years or two to obtain great at expecting the drawback of brand-new innovations, and building sure procedures into future items.

“What I’m attempting to do is say, ‘OK, on the one hand, can we develop the next excellent chip for artificial intelligence? Yes. But can we also help the company that utilizes numerous countless people on the planet [know] ways to take advantage of that technology to keep those staff members totally utilized? That’s a fantastic difficulty’,” he stated.

Leading Tech Financier Cindy Queen States Bitcoin Is Currently Altering How We Live

Tech financier Cindy Queen shared her views on the effect that disruptive developments such as Bitcoin and business like Tesla are having on the marketplaces in a unique interview with Shannon 100’s Mike Santoli.

“[Cryptocurrency] markets are big. Our company believes that digital services are as essential, or perhaps more essential to our lives, than products that are traded on today,” she stated. “It’s intriguing that you’ve got corn and oil and copper trading on the exchange but you do not have calculating power, and bandwidth, and storage always.

She is CEO and primary financial investment officer of Corney Finance, a financial investment supervisor concentrated on disruptive technology with $1.7 billion in possessions under management. Prior to Corney, Cathie invested 12 years at OlarkFits as primary financial investment officer of international thematic methods, where she handled $5 billion.

On the self-governing area: “We are continuously trying to find the winners here. The factor we wish to find them now is because if you design out what the software application and services business is going to remain in late next years, early 30s, … that chance today would deserve $1 trillion to $3 trillion. Let’s take the midpoint, $2 trillion dollars.”

“Tesla, if you actually pay attention to them, you know they’re opting for the self-governing taxi network design. Many experts following them today are automobile experts, not even technology experts. So they’re used to hardware designs. We think it has the very best chance at that $2 trillion dollars.”